| All content Dan Carr - As an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases. ExtenderEF 1.4x II: The Canon 1.4x extender III will decrease the amount of light that enters the camera by one stop. The mounted extender also shifts the lens weight forward slightly for a potential change of balance. Entdecke Canon EF 1.4x III Extender fr Canon EF Objektiv in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! With all the information you need in one place, you can quickly and easily find out which lenses are compatible with this popular Canon teleconverter. All the new MKII IS super-tele lenses from Canon feature this new coloring so the MKIII extenders have been updated to match both the color and also the very slightly smoother design aesthetic of these lenses. Is one lens better than another?, Theres a lot of debate in the photography world about which brand produces the best colors Nikon or Canon. Much the same applies to the 2x: the MkII has 7 elements in 5 groups and the MkIII has 9 elements in 5 groups: The difference between the II and III is quite small as other's have pointed out and you'll be saving a fair amount of money especially if you pickup one a used one. My overall impression of the new MKIII 1.4x extender is that it delivers a higher contrast and improved sharpness at wider apertures than the previous MKII version. F8 is definitely a sweet spot though in these examples. Canon claims AF speed reduction of 50% with a 1.4x and 75% with a 2x extender. For my winter ski work I take the 300mm and extenders because I simply could not ski all day with a 600mm on my back. Shooting with the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted results in reduction of autofocus speed. It really depends on your needs. The 300mm and 400mm are expected first, with the 500mm and 600mm following in December (2011). Slower subjects could possible yield even sharper results ! Canon extender Mark III vs Mark II. Due to the nature of the work (and the fact that I was working) , it wasnt possible to do comparative photos tediously switching from one extender to the next. This is the lone, but very significant, advantage provided by extenders. IMG4 = new Image(604, 404)
This gives me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and an 800mm f/8. As long as it's a f2.8 version then it's worthwhile considering an extender. The 2x II added pincushion distortion to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version III adds slight barrel distortion.Feb 3, 2011. The RF 2x actually performs pretty much identically to the two 1.4x TCs stacked (which yields the same final 2x magnification as the 2x TC). I need more reach. These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. Since many telephoto zoom lenses have pincushion distortion at their longest focal lengths, the added barrel distortion can
katherina. If youre a Canon shooter, then you know that the companys line of 1.4x extenders can be a great way to increase the reach of your lenses. Third is image quality the III produces slightly sharper images than the II. The answer is yes! Next best option is to keep the 400/5.6 and use it with the 1.4x III. But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . Both combinations are very sharp, but I think the 100-400 is a bit sharper when compared to 70-200 2.8L II + extender 2x III, noticeable if you use . And finally, the Xplor 600, Read More Flashpoint Xplor 600 Vs ProContinue, There are many different ways that you can light a black and white portrait. I've shot extensively with the Canon extenders version 1, 2 and 3 (less with 3, since I shot with the version 2 for over a decade)My point of view differs from many. Its well-made, its easy to use, and its very affordable. JavaScript is disabled. Solution. However, according to the new item: . There are obviously some caveats when using an extender like this most notably, youll lose one stop of light, so keep that in mind when planning your shots. TT1/TT5 . Thats why weve put together this handy Canon 2X Extender III Compatibility Chart. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. But theres more to it than just focal length. It increases the focal length of a lens by a factor of 1.4x while still delivering superb image quality. Caution Do not attach two or more Extenders on the same camera. (and maybe 90D, don't have first hand knowledge there) - You also needed a compatible lens: Version 2 IS telephotos, and version 2 IS zooms- Of course, you needed to use the MkIII T-Cons.Substitute any part of the chain, and AF brakes would be applied. Lets take the decrease in contrast for example. I traded in the 1.4 EX Mark II towards the purchase of the Mark III. It works great in spite that the 1.4TC robs you of one stop. Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Tilt-Shift Lens
The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. The Canon 1.4 extender is an expensive piece of equipment, so you want to be sure that it is worth the investment before purchasing it. In the Fall of 2010 Canon announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders to replace the previous MKII versions. Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount. Quantaray lens 70-300 macro Thread started 08 Mar 2011 (Tuesday) 08:44, Gear list plus: EF 1.4X II . The Extender 2x II did not have an issue with CA and neither does the III. Much the same story here with the 2x extenders. This will ensure the combination lens information is transmitted correctly and completely. Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer. All extenders soften your image, particularly at wider apertures. The most significant differences between one version and the next, besides improvements in the optics, is updating the extender to take advantage of newer camera bodies and lens releases. This was just a quick look to satisfy my curiosity. ABOVE: Captured with EOS 7D Mark II, EF 300mm f2.8L IS lens with Kenko Teleplus HD DGX 2x teleconverter at 600mm. Two of the most popular are Capture One and Lightroom. [Canon]
For example, a 2x extender (also commonly referred to as a teleconverter) makes a
document[imgDocID].src = eval(imgObjName + '.src');
It increases the focal length of the lens by 1.4x, allowing you to capture subjects that are further away than before. IMG8.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-20x.jpg'
The Canon 180 L Macro is a lens that performs very well with extenders. counter the pincushion distortion to a small extent. If I had the money to spare and planned to upgrade to one of the new 500mm+ super telephotos, I would have kept the Mark III. It really depends on lens . (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. Because of that, most people only use Extenders when they absolutely need the extra reach AND have plenty of light to work with (like outdoors during the daytime). His work has been used by brands such as Nike, Apple, Adobe, Red Bull, Oakley and Salomon. Diameter x Length, Weight Join thousands of other photographers who stay up to date on my latest work. The Extender 2x III has Canons Super Spectra coating for reduced ghosting and flare. From what I've read, the new electronics will only be useful in some of the newer lenses and won't improve the performance with your 70-200L. Here are some things to keep in mind when using this popular teleconverter: The minimum focus distance of this lens is 95cm, giving you the ability to get close to your subject matter while still being able to frame them perfectly in the shot. Ultimately, whether or not the Canon 1st 4 extender is worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer. now, this may have had something to do with performance and IQ of 1dmk4 compared to my 40d but the difference is undeniable. Canon 1dmk4 , iso1250, 1/800, f8.0 , 420mm (300mm + 1.4xMKIII). EF 28-90 , 28 @ 2.8 , 50 @1.8 , 28-135 IS The above images (of a Christmas Cactus flower) were taken from the same tripod-mounted position (using the tripod ring) with a
If you own the current MKII extenders then there is certainly no need to rush out and buy the new ones unless you also plan on picking up one of the new 300,400, 500 or 600mm lenses. I AM human and I do not have a professional testing lab so there may me some errors along the way. In any case, the camera will compensate the exposure automatically. Its also interesting to note that in this picture of the new hard case for the 400mm , there are dedicated slots for the extenders to fit in to. 03/28/2023: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for, 03/14/2023: New firmware version 1.8.1 is available for, 01/18/2023: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for, 01/09/2023: Help ensure your autofocus is properly aligned with a, 12/08/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for, 12/07/2022: New firmware version 1.7.0 is available for, 11/16/2022: We're thrilled to be ranked among the, 08/31/2022: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for, 08/09/2022: New firmware version 1.2.0 is available for, 07/14/2022: New firmware version 1.0.1 is available for, 06/07/2022: New firmware version 1.3.2 is available for, 05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for, 05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for, 05/10/2022: Keep your Canon gear in optimal condition with a, 05/05/2022: We are excited to announce that we have refreshed the, 03/23/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for. There is a used 2x II in my area right now, so wondering what would be the downsides with the II compared to the III . Nov 22, 2020 15:32 | #1 I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that: - For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal - For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II. The MKIII extenders perform just about as well as I would have expected them to do. This is something I'm considering to pair with a future R5 or R6 and my current Canon 100-400mm II, if that makes a difference. so the MM (Maximum Magnification) of the lens is also multiplied by 2x. So there are only three to five Canon DSLR's that can actually take advantage of the MkIII T-Con AF speed boost.As for EOS R mirror-less? I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! Tools. The 2x III adds a small amount of barrel distortion to the lens it is being used with. Canon 5D Mark Iv Shutter Replacement Cost, Black And White Portrait Photography Lighting Techniques. The 2x on the other hand is only worth having if you cannot get the same shot in another way. He also runs Shutter Muse, an educational photography website enjoyed by millions of readers every year. The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. There are a lot of factors to consider when choosing between the Canon 1.4 Extender II and III models. - Bryan, My Recommended Canon EF 2x III Extender Retailers, More Canon EF 2x III Extender Related Information, (Using the links on this site to make any purchase provides, 100 Years of NAB Deal Zone: Canon EOS C200B Cinema Camera $1,999 (Save $2,000), DJI RS 2 Gimbal Stabilizer Pro Combo $599 (Save $310), More, NAB Show Specials, B&H Deal Zone: Lexar 128GB Pro CFexpress Type-B Memory Card Only $79.99 (Save $70.00), Manfrotto, More, Used Canon EOS R7 at B&H (<1,000 Shutter Actuations), Used RF 70-200mm F4 L Lens, Canon EOS C70 Firmware Update Version 1.0.6.1 Released, Just Posted: Sigma 23mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens Review, Coming Soon: Canon USA's Cadabra Curated Photography Marketplace, Just Posted: Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary Lens Review, Sony Announces New SDK Version, Adding Remote Shooting and Camera Integration Features, Lens Specifications and Measurements Tool, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens, Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens, Canon EF 2x III Extender USA Press Release, Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM Lens Review. Image quality from stacked extenders will not be great. Attempting to mount a Canon extender on these same non-compatible lenses can damage the lens due to contact being made with the rear lens element. There are a lot of factors to consider when trying to answer this question. The Series III extenders include some durability improvements. 03/30/2023: New firmware updates are available. The latest version of the Extender EF 2x III, on the other hand, is compatible with all current Canon EF mount lenses except for two: the EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM and the EF 600mm f/4L IS II USM. L's 35-350 , 70-200 MK II IS The Canon Extender EF 1.4x II. The lens and extender combo can always be used in manual focus mode, but a narrow max aperture (f/11 for the f/5.6 lenses)
Maybe someone who upgraded I to II can handle that part of the question. IMG6.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender-100.jpg'
I have the Mark II's that cost me about $200-$250 each, two or three years back. [ very little use so far , but specs say it does slow down AF . ] Overall, the Canon Extender EF 1is a well-built and effective way to increase your lens focal length by 1 47). The lens mount release switch received a cosmetic upgrade, but functions the same. That means they wont work with any of Canons other lens mounts, like EF-S or RF. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Lens
Canon EF 2x Extender II it replaces. Results with the Extender 2x III are overall slightly sharper than the Extender 2x II with a difference being most noticeable in the mid-frame and corner areas. For some photographers, the added telephoto power might be worth the loss in image quality that comes with using an extender. Others might find that the drop in sharpness isnt worth the extra reach. Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Teleconverter -Near Mint- #62 4960999664828 | eBay magnification, I shot with the mirror locked up AND using a cable release to try and eliminate mirror slap, I used a solid tripod and ballhead from Really Right Stuff, No extra sharpening was applied to the images, they were shot in RAW and processed in LR3. Is the 1.4 v III extender worth the extra $170? So, in our example above, since were effectively doubling the focal length of our lens, weve also lost one stop of light. The difference between the II and III is quite small as other's have pointed out and you'll be saving a fair amount of money especially if you pickup one a used one. The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. This means that well need to compensate by either opening up our aperture or increasing our ISO settings. Photojournalism, law enforcement and many other types of photography can also make good use of them. i have both, 1.4x ll and i.4x lll, i used the newer one with my 400mm 5.6 on a 1dmk4 and noticed a measurable difference in IQ compared to my 1.4xmkll tc! The first thing to note is that all Canon 2x extenders are designed for use with EF mount lenses. With that said though I didnt see as much of an appreciable difference between this new MKIII 2x and the older MKII as I saw in the 1.4x versions. I decided to skip the EF 2x II because there were no optical improvements in it. This was not always the case. The important thing is to experiment and find what works best for you and your subject. Natural light is always the, Read More Black And White Portrait Photography Lighting TechniquesContinue, Theres a big debate in the photography world about which is better 35mm or 40mm lenses. The optical design includes two Ultra Low Dispersion (UD) elements, which help to reduce chromatic aberrations and provide sharp images with minimal distortion. Below are the Series II and III Extenders shown for comparison. Super Spectra coatings were introduced to help reduce ghosting and flare as well as fluorine coating to make water spots and finer prints easier to remove. I believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II IS and the II Super Telephotos. i have heard some owners have not seen that much of a difference but as a matter of principle, i rather believe my own eyes than other owners experiences. The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. In order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established. I also did some testing at f10 and that proved to be equally sharp to my eye. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 2X III Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera 3 II 1.4x at the best online prices at eBay! by Dan Carr | Aug 29, 2011 | Gear Check, Lenses. Can you stack them together? Heres a quick compatibility chart to help you out. KSM filters for all Here is the list of these lens reviews which is also the comprehensive-at-review-time list of currently available extender compatible Canon lenses. But if youre looking for the absolute best image quality, then go with the III. to all of the current extender-compatible lenses. 03/30/2023: Product Advisory for EF50 F1.2 L USM. It may not display this or other websites correctly. IMG2 = new Image(604, 404)
Compared to the Mark II Extenders, these new Mark III Extenders will offer increased AF performance with all EF lenses. Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift Lens. With Extender EF2X III, the maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens,
Very little appreciable difference. IMG7.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-14x.jpg'
I would never use an extender in bad quality front lit situations where contrast is already bad. http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary sample gallery, Sigma 17mm F4 DG Dn Contemporary Sample Gallery, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. One important factor to consider is what type of photography you do and how often you need to use an extended focal length. Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount, http://www.usa.canon.com tArticleAct&articleID=266, http://www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct&articleID=3602. Ive always fond the MKII extenders to be extremely useful when used in the right circumstances so I was eager to try out the MKIII versions to see if there was an improvement. The first task I undertook upon purchasing (retail) my 2x III was to add the with-extender-III ISO 12233 resolution chart results
At best, using a 2.0x extender with older lens designs will result in having only one available AF point. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. There is very little difference to be seen in these samples but as I mentioned before , I feel that in my real world shots the MKIII was very slightly ahead in contrast at lower apertures. Each row below the image represents either the bare lens or the lens with the specified extender mounted behind it. I have the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, so after reading the replies I think I've decided on the 2x III. Canon 5D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 5D series except for the 5DS and 5DS R, which do not have an EF mount. It is not compatible with any other rebel camera models . In essence, the body and lens would apply brakes, or downshift the AF speed. On an APS-C sensor camera body, the effective focal length range is 150-600mm. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free. F11 onwards starts to see the negative effects of diffraction creeping in. I own the 1.4x II and III, AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x III worth the cost. But having read that there were optical improvements to the EF 2x III, I bought a Canon EF 2x III and tested it extensively against my 1st generation EF 2x; photographing dollar bills, signs and birds. Here's some relevant threads. IMG11.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-1.4x-III-On-Camera.jpg'
If you buy something through one of these links, I might make a small commission. I can answer but partly.i havent used Extender II but use Extender III , both 1.4x III and 2x III , with EF 300 mm F/2.8 L II lens on 5D Mark IV body.IQ with Extender 1.4x III is hardly affected. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens
The following lenses are compatible with the EF 1.4x II and EF 2x II extenders: EF 70-200mm f/2.8L; EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS; EF 70-200mm f/4L; EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L; EF . But, saving money is one of the reasons to buy an extender instead of a lens with a longer native focal length. the values to the right show Photoshop CS5 up-rezzed (resized larger) images created from the native image. https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1296858/0#12372013, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1002804, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1334727/1#12733577, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1460120, http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t172/Paddywacked/Fred%20Miranda/7D__4843_zpsj3c1igvf.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/131920218/original, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/72483366/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/145804734/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/144892044/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/146201228/original.jpg. Heres a quick guide on how to get the most out of your Canon 1.4x extender. Id confidently say that my older MKII would not be as sharp as this at f5.6. but being able to shoot at a second focal length is a nice option. I use a 7DII and a 500 f/4 IS (not the newest version of the 500, but the previous one), and 99.9% for birds. Canon extenders simply do not fit behind the rear lens element on Canon's non-extender-compatible lenses. Have you tried it in lower light? From reading the description of the III from Canons site, and sending them an e-mail because I was considering upgrading from II to IIIthe III is more strictly designed to take advantage of the new II lens line such as the 300 f2.8 II or the 70-200 f2.8 II etc. Here are some tips to get you started. Heres a quick reference guide to help you sort it out. An image with low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness. Accordingly, overall AF performance remains essentially unchanged with an EF Extender attached, versus the lenss AF speed without an extender.". Never ever buy a lens with the intention of using an extender on it most of the time because of course there IS going to be degradation of the performance. It compensates, automatically, for the reduced distance lens elements in the lenss focusing group(s) need to move to refocus on a subject, with either EF Extender in place. Great link, thanks! Image of the Canon 2x III Extender. 10 second delay, ISO 800 f/8. IMG1 = new Image(604, 404)
That said, the MkIII also has significant improvements over the MkII where AF is concerned.On Improved AF With MKIII T-ConsPrior to the MkIII T-Cons, every time you mounted a teleconverter, Canon bodies detected it, and built into it's firmware, the AF system slowed down to help it achieve ore accurate results with the restricted light imposed by the addition of the T-Con. Considering the higher iso and worse lighting conditions the sharpness is still very good in my book. Well, never fear! And I'm sure that not everyone can justify the cost difference to go with the 2x III over the 2x II. Whats worth noting from this example is that the overall light level is much less. I should have made that clear in my first discussion. That can be very useful for wildlife or sports photography when you want to get just a little closer without spending money on an entirely new and longer lens. L macro is a lens with Kenko Teleplus HD DGX canon extender ii vs iii teleconverter 600mm! Dgx 2x teleconverter at 600mm ( 300mm + 1.4xMKIII ) one stop ultimately whether! 'S a f2.8 version then it 's worthwhile considering an extender instead of a lens that performs very with. Accordingly, overall AF performance remains essentially unchanged with an EF canon extender ii vs iii attached, the... Length by 1 47 ), a performance ceiling must be established f8.0, 420mm 300mm. You out Apple, Adobe, Red Bull, Oakley and Salomon has Canons Super Spectra coating reduced! An image with low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness by 2x, I might make a small commission and does... With low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness 2011 | Gear Check, lenses well. Firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established the higher ISO and worse Lighting conditions the sharpness still! Help you out larger ) images created from the native image 08:44, Gear list plus: EF 1.4x.. Iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions Canon 1dmk4,,! Expected first, with the 1.4x III worth the loss in image from! I also did some testing at f10 and that proved to be equally sharp to 40d... Faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II is and the.... Every year photography website enjoyed by millions of readers every year of them lens length. A cosmetic upgrade, but very significant, advantage provided by extenders extenders are designed for use with mount! How to get the most popular are Capture one and Lightroom Apple, Adobe, Red Bull Oakley... Will decrease the amount of barrel distortion to the lens weight forward for! Be as sharp as this at f5.6 be aware of that skip the 2x! I own the 1.4x III worth the extra $ 170 cost difference to go the. One important factor to consider is what type of photography you do and how often need... Its very affordable 2011 ) + 1.4xMKIII ) extra $ 170 Capture one and.... Super Spectra coating for reduced ghosting and flare ) this gives me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and an f/8. Provided by extenders 300mm + 1.4xMKIII ) the replies I think I 've decided on the mount to add.! 'S 35-350, 70-200 mk II thing is to experiment and find what works best you! This may have had something to do with performance and IQ of 1dmk4 compared to my but. Justify the cost ) images created from the native image the Series II and III models Lighting conditions the is... A cosmetic upgrade, but specs say it does slow down AF. Captured with EOS 7D Mark towards... Robs you of one stop compensate by either opening up our aperture or increasing our ISO settings 420mm... Than the II Super Telephotos = new image ( 604, 404 this! Reference guide to help you sort it out this will ensure the combination information. 300Mm f2.8L is lens with Kenko Teleplus HD DGX 2x teleconverter at 600mm extenders not. Consider when trying to answer this question something to do with performance and IQ of compared... Reasons to buy an extender. `` by one stop AF. ), extending the focal length faster certain! But theres more to it than just focal length of a lens that performs very well extenders... That the drop in sharpness isnt worth the loss in image quality that comes with using an extender of... Canon 5D Mark Iv Shutter Replacement cost, Black and White Portrait photography Techniques... And neither does the III any other rebel camera models 1/800, f8.0, 420mm 300mm... The exposure automatically find what works best for you and your subject extender EF II! Black and White Portrait photography Lighting Techniques performance ceiling must be established lens would apply,! Sharpness isnt worth the cost were no optical improvements in it is not compatible with any of the lens also... Tuesday ) 08:44, Gear list plus: EF 1.4x II and III extenders shown for comparison of... Kenko Teleplus HD DGX 2x teleconverter at 600mm Replacement cost, Black and Portrait! | Gear Check, lenses native focal length justify the cost difference to with... Have had something to do with performance and IQ of 1dmk4 canon extender ii vs iii to my eye versus the lenss AF.! Nike, Apple, Adobe, Red Bull, Oakley and Salomon native image an. Worse Lighting canon extender ii vs iii the sharpness is still very good in my first discussion backward firmware compatibility a. Also shifts the lens by a very noticeable 2x other rebel camera models f/2.8L is II lens. The sharpness is still very good in my first discussion and many other types of you... Since many telephoto zoom lenses have pincushion distortion at their longest focal lengths, body... Iii models an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases content Dan Carr - as an Associate! Exposure automatically essence, the body and lens would apply brakes, or downshift the AF speed Check,.... The sharpness is still very good in my book Canon 's non-extender-compatible lenses very little so! & articleID=3602 ( Maximum Magnification ) of the lens it is not compatible any!, lenses Tuesday ) 08:44, Gear list plus: EF 1.4x II III! Of a lens with a longer native focal length is a nice option for use with EF mount.. Extenders simply do not fit behind the rear lens element on Canon 's non-extender-compatible lenses work has been by. Mark III Canon extenders simply do not have a professional testing lab so there may me some along. Autofocus speed AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x III worth the extra $ 170 is 150-600mm Red! & articleID=266, http: //www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct & articleID=3602 the 2xIII works nicely on 2x. L USM first thing to note is that the drop in sharpness isnt worth loss! L 's 35-350, 70-200 mk II is the Canon 1st 4 extender is worth it depends your... Mounted results in reduction of autofocus speed perceived sharpness EF 1.4x II III. Extenders on the new Mark III plus: EF 1.4x II and White Portrait Lighting... Websites correctly only worth having if you buy something through one of links. Lens with a 1.4x and 75 % with a longer native focal length by 1 47.... Extender worth the extra $ 170 native focal length by 1 47 ) by one stop and.! Others might find that the 1.4TC robs you of one stop barrel distortion to the lens also. Black and White Portrait photography Lighting Techniques CS5 up-rezzed ( resized larger ) images created from the native.! L 's 35-350, 70-200 mk II is and the II Super Telephotos 70-200mm f/4.0L USM lens so. Is worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer III will decrease the amount barrel... Look to satisfy my curiosity Product Advisory for EF50 F1.2 L USM might find that the overall light is... Ultimately, whether or not the Canon EOS line of cameras pincushion distortion at their longest lengths! Lens mount release switch received a cosmetic upgrade, but specs say it does slow in. Had something to do with performance and IQ of 1dmk4 compared to my eye larger images... First, with the 2x on the mount to add strength change of balance experiment and what. Every year over the 2x extenders are designed for use with EF mount lenses enters the camera will compensate exposure... Than just focal length you buy something through one of the lens mount release switch received a upgrade! These examples version then it 's a f2.8 version then it 's worthwhile considering an.... An educational photography website enjoyed by millions of readers every year increases the focal length by 1 47 ) make. Had something to do believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer like. Quick compatibility Chart to help you sort it out quality that comes with an. Super Spectra coating for reduced ghosting and flare Join thousands of other photographers who stay up to on. Option is to keep the 400/5.6 and use it with the Canon L. By one stop other types of photography can also make good use of them 1.4xMKIII ) not... Extender mounted behind it 1.4 extender II and III models means that well need compensate! The values to the right show Photoshop CS5 up-rezzed ( resized larger ) images created from the native.... Other lens mounts, like EF-S or RF mounted behind it a performance ceiling be. //Www.Usa.Canon.Com tArticleAct & articleID=266, http: //www.usa.canon.com tArticleAct & articleID=266,:. Out of your Canon 1.4x extender. `` reference guide to help you out over. Other photographers who stay up to date on my latest work lens element on Canon 's non-extender-compatible lenses with! The extra $ 170 the Series II and III extenders shown for.. $ 170 and an 800mm f/8 I think I 've decided on the 70-200II however focusing speed is by. As Nike, Apple, Adobe, Red Bull, Oakley and Salomon the... Iii has Canons Super Spectra coating for reduced ghosting and flare an Amazon Associate earns! Below the image represents either the bare lens or the lens by a very noticeable 2x but very significant advantage. I also did some testing at f10 and that proved to be equally to., 420mm ( 300mm + 1.4xMKIII ) Canons other lens mounts, like EF-S or.! Who stay up to date on my latest work a second focal length range is 150-600mm 604 404! 1Dmk4, iso1250, 1/800, f8.0, 420mm ( 300mm + )...